1. Hackintosh Os X Lion
2. Hackintosh Os X Download

When you buy a Mac computer, you are buying the hardware and the software combined. We all know that we can't just purchase the software - aka macOS - and install it on our PC; unless you build a Hackintosh, that is. Below we will analyze all the advantages and disadvantages of a Hackintosh, and we will see why you can't just install macOS on any computer, as you would do with Windows or Linux.

Hackintosh.com links to everything you need to build a Hackintosh and get macOS Catalina (10.15) as well as many earlier versions of Mac OS X running on an unsupported computer - instructions, step-by-step 'how to' guides, and tutorials - in addition to installation videos, lists of compatible computers and parts, and communities for support. R/hackintosh: A subreddit dedicated to running macOS on non standard Apple hardware. Most stable OS X version for development?

Unblock any international website, browse anonymously, and download movies and Mp3 with complete safety with CyberGhost, just for $2.75 per month:

Table of Contents

• What exactly is a Hackintosh?
• Is Hackintosh legal?
• Hackintosh is not for everyone

What exactly is a Hackintosh?

If you are not familiar with Hackintosh, then you probably haven't heard of OSx86 as well. But let's start from the beginning.

A little history

Apple doesn't need any special introduction. We all know it is one of the largest technology companies that designs and develops computers, smartphones, software, and online services.

The most known consumer software from Apple is macOS for computers and laptops, and iOS for smartphones, but that wasn't always the case.

Apple's story starts back in 1976 when it was founded by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne. By the end of 1970's, they had already launched their first products, Apple I, II, and III. However, Apple's first success came with the Macintosh models in the 80's.

Macintosh

The first Macintosh was introduced in 1984, which was Apple's first mass-produced personal computer with a graphical user interface.

Macintosh computers run the Macintosh System Software operating system, which was later rebranded into Mac OS in 1996.

The brand changed several times through the years. In 2001 it became Mac OS X, until 2010 that changed again to just 'OS X.' From 2016, we know it as macOS.

As for the name 'Macintosh,' it was replaced with the shorter 'Mac' on 1998 and hasn't changed since then.

Transition to Intel processors

Up until 2006, Apple used PowerPC processors on Macintosh computers, while Windows PCs used Intel and AMD chipsets. That way, it was impossible to run any of these operating systems on a non-official hardware.

However, in June 2005, Steve Jobs announced that Apple would produce Intel-based Macintosh computers. By the way, this is the reason we can only download Photoshop for free on Windows PCs and not on a modern Mac.

In January 2006, the company introduced the iMac and MacBook Pro, which were the first Intel-based Mac machines. More specifically, they were based on the Intel Core Duo platform, and they run Mac OS X 10.4.4 Tiger.

Apple later announced that it would complete the transition to Intel processors by the end of 2006. With Mac OS X v10.6 Snow Leopard on 2009, the first Intel-only Mac OS X, the company finally stopped the support for the PowerPC microprocessors.

Since Apple moved to the Intel chipset, it was possible to run Windows on Apple hardware. Although the company provided a supported method to dual boot OS X and Windows, it refused to support the installation of OS X on other hardware.

And that's where Hackintosh came into play.

OSx86

OSx86 is a hacking project that enables us to run OS X on non-Apple systems. The project is also known as 'Hackintosh,' a portmanteau of the words 'hack' and 'Macintosh.' If the hacked computer is a laptop, sometimes it is called 'Hackbook.'

The transition to Intel processors was the beginning of OSx86, a name derived from OS X and the x86 architecture. The early efforts were crappy, with plenty of bugs and incompatibilities. The project would adequately support only a few GPUs, and it was almost impossible to install new updates, without breaking anything.

Since then, many communities appeared on the Internet to support the Hackintosh. There are a lot of step by step guides that describe how we can install macOS - or previous versions of the operating system - on laptops and custom desktop PCs.

Thanks to all these forums and communities, there is now a lot of support on how to assemble a Hackintosh, what parts to choose, how to overcome any problems, etc. Hackintosh has indeed become easier than it used to be.

The most popular community is OSx86 Project. For more information, you can also have a look at tonymacx86. In case you want to build a Hackintosh, these are good places to start. For AMD users, the AMD OS X forum will be your best friend.

Why would I want a Hackintosh computer?

There are several reasons why people what to build a Hackintosh computer.

First of all, some users prefer macOS over Windows, but they don't want to spend a fortune on buying a Mac.

Besides, a Mac is a pre-built computer. Nowadays, people tend to select their hardware and build their machines based on their needs. Others want the computer to have a certain look and feel, or they don't like a Mac's design.

Furthermore, Mac computers are locked down. That means we cannot upgrade their parts, easily install more RAM, replace the hard drive, etc.

That's why PC enthusiasts turn to Hackintosh to run macOS, because Hackintosh provides the scalability and power of a PC, along with the efficiency of macOS.

And then there's curiosity. A significant portion of Hackintosh users want to experiment with a different OS or do it for the tinkering aspect. For some people, half the fun of working with computers is to make them do things they were not built to do.

How about performance?

Performance-wise, a Hackintosh with the same high-end hardware components as a Mac can perform better in benchmarks, rendering times, etc.

In this video, there is a comparison between the 5Κ iMac and a 1000$ Skylake Hackintosh with similar hardware. Have in mind that the Mac costs from 2.500$ to 4.500$, depending on the model.

In the matrix below we can see the specification of the machines used in the comparison.

The results on most benchmarks favor the Hackintosh over Mac Pro, 5K iMac, and 2016 Mac Book Pro.

There are several other benchmark tests on the Internet that conclude to the same thing: Hackintosh performs better than a Mac.

Is Hackintosh legal?

If you install macOS or any operating system in the OS X family on non-official Apple hardware, you violate Apple's EULA for the software. According to the company, Hackintosh computers are illegal, due to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Some people suggest that, if you use a legitimately purchased copy of macOS, it is 100% legal to install it on any machine you want.

That would make sense if you didn't agree to Apple's end-user license agreement. The EULA mentions that we don't buy the software, we only 'license' it. And the license terms do not permit us to install the software on a non-Apple machine.

If you install macOS on non-official hardware, you breach the contract and the copyright law. Apple, on the other hand, has the right to act upon a breach of contract and right violation.

Of course, communities like OSx86 have existed for years. That probably means that Apple doesn't care or doesn't want to spend money and effort against such acts. Maybe Hackintosh computers don't have any significant effect on Mac sales, who knows.

That said, PCsteps doesn't hold any responsibility for your actions. It is up to you whether you decide to build a Hackintosh and run into problems with Apple. The purpose of this article is purely informative.

The story of Psystar

Psystar Corporation was a company that sold Mac clones. The term refers to computers that run Mac OS, but are made and manufactured by third-party companies.

In other words, we can say that Psystar's computers were the first commercially distributed Hackintosh computers.

On July 3, 2008, Apple filed a lawsuit against Psystar Corporation for violation of copyrights, but the conflict didn't end there. Psystar responded with a countersuit for anti-competitive practices and monopolistic behavior.

However, the countersuit was dismissed. Long story short, the case reached the Supreme Court, which decided that Apple was right, and Psystar violated its DMCA rights.

Psystar's computers were based on the OSx86 project, but the developers of the project claimed that Psystar didn't get permission to use their code. Thus, they reworked their license after the incidence, strictly forbidding commercial usage of their code.

Hackintosh is not for everyone

It is true, Hackintosh is not for everyone. We saw that a Hackintosh has higher performance than a Mac, depending on the hardware used. But we also mentioned that the process is complicated and illegal.

If you wonder whether or not you should install macOS on a custom computer, we got you covered. Below you'll find all the advantages and disadvantages of Hackintosh so that you can decide.

Pros

• Cost effectiveness: Is it all about the money after all? Maybe. A Mac's price is way off the limit for many of us. Contrary, in a Hackintosh you pay for the hardware you get, and it is certainly less expensive and greater value for money.
• Custom build: The main reason people choose Hackintosh over Mac is that they can use custom computer parts. Although limited to specific CPUs, motherboards, etc., users can still make a choice between a wide range of parts, plus they pick the monitor or a PC case of their liking. The variety is significantly greater than a pre-built Mac computer.
• Better performance: Since you can install a high-end GPU, it makes sense that a Hackintosh is more powerful than a Mac. The video card can also help with GPU rendering with CUDA, which isn't always possible on a Mac.
  
• Upgradable: There is a sense of flexibility when you can upgrade your computer whenever you want. With Hackintosh, you can install more RAM, change CPU, etc., as long as you choose parts that are compatible.
• Fun: Last but not least, the fun part is something you should take into consideration. If you like to tinker and experiment with computers and different operating systems, you may have found your next project.

Cons

• Specific hardware: Hackintosh won't run on any PC, you have to buy specific parts to make it work. There is a lot of support in the Hackintosh community that can help you buy the right parts, but this doesn't mean it will work on a machine that you already have sitting in the basement.
• High level of difficulty: If you are the type of user that wants everything ready out of the box, Hackintosh is not for you. It will take a lot of effort to make it work, even with the right hardware. Moreover, you may run into issues at any point after the installation, and that will require search and digging into articles and forums to solve them.

• No support: If anything goes wrong, which is not a rare phenomenon on Hackintosh computers, you have to fix it by yourselves. Apple won't support you in any way. This is a very significant drawback for those that want to use Hackintosh for professional purposes, and thus it is definitely not recommended for such cases.
• Risk on updates: When you update a Hackintosh, don't expect a smooth experience as it would be the case with an official Mac computer. As we mentioned, you may run into problems, and updates are known to 'break' things in Hackintosh.
• Illegal: Apple says that Hackintosh is illegal, and that is a good reason not to try it.

Do you plan to build a Hackintosh?

Hackintosh is a pretty solid solution if you want macOS, with the price of a casual computer. However, for professionals that their job depends on their computer or inexperienced users that prefer an out of the box experience, it is not recommended. Plus, we should not forget that Hackintosh is not legal.

In case you just want to try macOS, you can create a virtual machine inside Windows. It is just as illegal as a Hackintosh, but much, much easier to set up and run.

Have you ever built a Hackintosh computer, or do you plan to build one in the future? Do you think that Hackintosh is better than a Mac? Did this article help you decide whether you should go for it or not?

You can share your experience with Hackintosh in the comment section. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Support PCsteps

Do you want to support PCsteps, so we can post high quality articles throughout the week?

You can like our Facebook page, share this post with your friends, and select our affiliate links for your purchases on Amazon.com or Newegg.

If you prefer your purchases from China, we are affiliated with the largest international e-shops:

Over time, the distribution of Mac OS versions among Mac users changes as new versions of the OS are released, old Macs are retired, and new models arrive that only support the most recent version. Today we’re looking at six years worth of data.

Bear in mind that this reflects visitors to lowendmac.com and is probably not reflective of the percentages of each version visiting a general interest site. That said, trends for each OS version should be similar.

The first graph shows the distribution of each version of Mac OS X on Intel-based Macs since OS X 10.4 Tiger over the period of October 2009 through September 2015. During that time, only one version of OS X has totally dominated the user base for an appreciable amount of time.

Tiger (introduced in April 2005, the first version of OS X for Intel Macs, and on the market for a record 2-1/2 years) was already down to 5% of those visiting lowendmac.com using Intel Macs, and OS X 10.5 Leopard – then two years old – was at 35% in October 2009.

Already at 62% share, OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard was in the ascent, having come to market in August 2009. It was the first version of OS X exclusive to Intel Macs, and users upgraded to it from Tiger and Leopard in droves. By the time it was replaced in July 2011, it had 83% share among Intel Mac users visiting Low End Mac. With nearly two years as the current OS X version, it takes second place only to Tiger in that department.

Starting in 2011, Apple made developer preview versions and sometimes also beta versions of the next revision of OS X available months before they were released to the public. Because of this, you’ll see a short low tail prior to release, and then the graph takes a big jump upward.

Hackintosh Os X Lion

OS X 10.7 Lion arrived in July 2011, and there were some big changes in store for users. First of all, those with Core Duo and Core Solo Macs couldn’t use it, marking the first time a version of OS X had left behind any Intel Macs. Secondly, Lion no longer supported Rosetta, Apple’s technology that let Intel Macs continue to run PowerPC software. For those using AppleWorks or older versions of Microsoft Office, Photoshop, etc., it meant upgrading would not be cheap – adding the cost of OS X and software updates.

Regardless, within a couple months Lion had cut Snow Leopard’s share to below 50%, and Lion itself reached the 55% mark among user before it was replaced by the next big cat.

You’ll also notice in the graph that after an initial spike in the percentage of users, there is always a brief drop as some users choose to go back to an earlier version of OS X.

OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, introduced in July 2012, also raised the hardware bar, and we are very fortunate that every version of OS X since has had the same system requirements. Mountain Lion cut Lion use in half almost immediately, and within a few months there were more OS X 10.6 users visiting Low End Mac than 10.7 users. From that point through the present, Lion has fallen further and further behind Snow Leopard, which remains surprisingly strong overall.

Mountain Lion peaked at 65%, then dipped a bit thanks to the heavily promoted OS X 10.9 Mavericks public beta. Mavericks was released in October 2013 as a free upgrade from OS X 10.6, 10.7, and 10.8, and it zoomed past the 50% mark in short order. With the same hardware requirements as 10.8 Mountain Lion, every Mountain Lion user could potentially make the switch – and for free.

Mavericks was one of only two versions of OS X to pass the 65% mark among users (based on our site stats), and it also had the highest adoption rate of any version of OS X for Intel Macs.

OS X 10.10 Yosemite was even more successful during its public beta period, but it didn’t take off as quickly as Mavericks had, nor did it reach the same level among users, topping out at 58% before OS X 10.11 El Capitan arrived to take its place as king of the OS X hill.

The next graph takes a different look at the same data. Each version of OS X is stacked on the previous one to display the data.

Yes, this graph pays homage to the colors of the original Apple logo.

By their width, you can see that OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard and 10.8 Mountain Lion were the “current” version of OS X longer than were Lion and Mavericks. More than that, you can readily see how use of OS X 10.4 Tiger and 10.5 Leopard has faded away over time, both are now in the 2% range.

At present, OS X 10.10 Mavericks has the lion’s share among users at 58%, although that will change as this is El Capitan’s first full month on the market. In second place, although barely, is OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, with 10.9 Mavericks just behind it – both at about 12%.

OS X 10.7 Lion comes in next at about 7%, most of those are probably users who cannot upgrade to OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion and later.

OS X 10.11 El Capitan has already surpassed Mountain Lion for the month of September 2012 – despite the fact that it was released on the last day of the month. Both 10.11 and 10.8 are at roughly 4%.

What About PowerPC Macs?

Over the six years of data we have, PowerPC Macs have gone from being 30% of our Mac users to now reaching the 10% mark. It’s not that a lot of old Macs are no longer in use, only that Apple has sold a heck of a lot more Intel Macs year after year, while the number of PowerPC Macs in service can do nothing but decline as they age.

Over the past six years, the percentage of PowerPC Mac users visiting lowendmac.com using OS X has had a remarkably even breakdown.

• 41% are using OS X 10.5 Leopard on their G4 and G5 Macs, with a low of 36% in /ate 2009/early 2010 to a high of 48% in 2012/13.
• 46% are using OS X 10.4 Tiger on their G3, G4, and G5 Macs, with numbers fluctuating between 43% and 50%.
• Overall, 14% are using earlier versions of OS X, with a high of 21% in 2010 and a low of 9% in late 2014/early 2015.

We don’t include PPC versions of OS X in our charts because they are a different market segment. As far as software development goes, PPC is practically dead in the water.

TenFourFox (TFF), a fork of the latest extended release revision (ESR) of Firefox optimized for G3, G4, and G5 chips, is the only ongoing software project. It supports both Tiger and Leopard, and it runs very nicely – especially on G4 and G5 Macs, where it can use the AltiVec velocity engine. TenFourFox supports HTML5 and JavaScript, although it does leave Flash behind (to which many say good riddance). Most YouTube videos will run just fine with TFF.

Yes, you read it right. You can run ESR version 38.3 of Firefox on your old PPC Macs that have OS X 10.4 and 10.5 installed. It just has a different name, but it works the same. Even most Firefox add-ons will work!

That’s a huge step forward from the official Mac PowerPC version of Firefox for Tiger and Leopard, which ceased development at version 3.6.28 in 2012.

And What About Core Duo Macs?

Although newer versions of OS X have really upped the hardware requirements, OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard remains a solid option for those using Core Duo Macs with 2 GB of system memory or older, slower Macs with 2-4 GB. I’m writing this on a Mid 2007 Mac mini, a Core 2 Duo machine with 3 GB of RAM, and it has been running Snow Leopard very nicely for years – even moreso since I replaced a failing hard drive with a 250 GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD.

Although OS X Tiger and Leopard will run with less memory, they are far more outdated than Snow Leopard. Best of all, with Snow Leopard you can still run PowerPC software and possibly the current version of Google’s Chrome browser, the second most popular browser on Macs – if you have a Core 2 Duo Mac. (32-bit Core Duo Macs are not supported on Chrome 39 and later, but you can still download Chrome 38 Final for these Macs.)

You can run the current version of Firefox on any Mac running Snow Leopard.

More Browser Options for PPC and Core Duo Macs

Safari for OS X 10.4, 10.5, and 10.6 is very dated. Look at Firefox and Chrome as the best options to start looking for a more current browser. You might also want to consider these:

Opera has been around since 1995, making it one of the oldest browsers still in production. For Tiger or Leopard on PPC, you want version 10.63. With Intel and Tiger, you can run Opera 11. Intel and Leopard lets you run Opera 12. And if you’re running OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard or newer, you can run Opera 25. (The current release is version 32. All versions from 26 forward require OS X 10.7 Lion.)

OmniWeb was the first browser for Mac OS X, ported over from the NeXT version. The current release version is 5.11.2, which requires OS X 10.4.8 or later and supports both PPC and Intel.

I’ve become a real fan of Stainless, a multithreaded Mac browser that supports parallel sessions in different tabs or windows. You can even log into the same website with different IDs in different windows. It hasn’t been updated since 2013, but it runs nicely on OS X 10.5 and later, even on PowerPC Macs.

Camino is even older than Stainless. It started out as a port of Mozilla to Mac OS X, and it ended development with version 2.1.2 in March 2012. It runs very nicely on OS X 10.4 and later, and it’s quick so long as you only have a few tabs or windows open.

With Lion, for Rosetta, the emulator that allowed PowerPC programs to run on Intel processor-equipped Macs.Microsoft has remained mum on a timetable for other Office 2011 fixes, including one for the Mail-to-Outlook bug and several minor problems with Excel, PowerPoint and Word.Fox also told customers that they'll have to wait for Microsoft to support new Lion features - such as auto save, document versioning and a full-screen mode - in Office for Mac 2011.' Office for mac os x lion. Communicator is the corporate version of Microsoft's consumer-grade Messenger chat client for the Mac, and is available only to business and academic volume licensing customers.

Best news reader for os x download. May 13, 2019  Reeder should be a familiar name to iOS users. In fact, when the Mac app first launched in 2011, it was a port from iOS to the Mac. Here’s Federico Viticci in his review of the original app. Whilst Reeder for iOS and Reeder for Mac are the same app as far as the main concept goes (quickly fetch unread items for Google Reader, skim through them easily, provide features to do anything you. Feedly, Reeder, and Safari are probably your best bets out of the 12 options considered. 'Clean UI' is the primary reason people pick Feedly over the competition. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision.

Hackintosh Os X Download

Shiira is another discontinued project (2009). It supports OS X 10.4.8 and later, so it’s an option. It was designed for speed.

iCab has an unusual history, being based on the CAB browser for Atari ST computers. Unlike the others, it’s $20 shareware that you can use for free for a limited time. I’ve been using it on and off since 1999, and . Version 2.9.9 supports the Classic Mac OS on 680×0 Macs running Mac OS 7.5 to 8.1. Version 3.0.5 (2008) requires a PowerPC processor and Mac OS 7.5 to 9.2.2. There is also a version 3.0.5 for OS X 10.1.5 to 10.5.

For the audience of this article, iCab 4.9 (2012) works with OS X 10.3.9 through 10.4.11, and 5.1.1 (2013) supports OS X 10.5 through 10.7. Those using OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard should consider iCab 5.2 (2014), which is compatible up to OS X 10.9.

Keywords: #macosxusershare #osxusershare #macosusershare

Short link: http://goo.gl/T6BR2M

searchword: osxusershare